|
|||||||
| Register | Login | AA Calendar NEW! | Groups | Mark Forums Read |
Thread: Esther GarrattHi everyone, I am currently researching Esther Garratt baptized on 28/2/1834 in Newport Pagnell, Bucks.. Her parents as ....... |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Committed Member
![]()
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 59
|
Hi everyone,
I am currently researching Esther Garratt baptized on 28/2/1834 in Newport Pagnell, Bucks.. Her parents as per IGI were Thomas Garratt and Martha. However the 1841c shows: Thomas Garratt, b. 1800, Bucks.,Elizabeth, wife, b 1801 Bucks., Caroline, dau 15, Hester dau 8, Magret dau 7 months, Thomas son 4, William son 10, res. Great Linford, Newport Pagnell. All the other childrens' births are on the IGI with name of mother Elizabeth. How can I check whether or not this is an error on the IGI? Would someone eventually be kind enough to help me with a parish register look-up please? Thanks, Sue |
|
|
|
| Advertisement |
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Committed Member
![]()
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southampton UK
Posts: 70
|
Quote:
I think your Thomas may have married twice. In 1851 17 year old Esther a lacemaker, is with her mother, Martha age 30?? (Bucks fhs cd mistranscript because that cannot be right unless she was a second wife as I suggest) a widow, with other children, Thomas 13 an aglab, Mary Ann 10, a lacemaker. Martha was running a lodging house at Marsh End in Newport Pagnall. There is a death of a Thomas Hindes Garrett in Newport Pagnell Reg Dist in 1845 (FreeBMD) but no marriage (yet ) to a Martha. Hope this helps and doesn't further confuse. Regards Victoria |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Committed Member
![]()
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 59
|
Hi Victoria,
Thank you so much for taking the time to help me with my research. I am trying to make sense of all of this, and am now wondering whether this Elizabeth or Martha is one and the same person. What makes me think this is because I cannot find a birth entry on the IGI for an Elizabeth Petts born c1801, but there is one for a Martha Petts born 1801 in Newport Pagnell. Maybe Martha called herself Elizabeth sometimes? Do you think that could be possible? It really doesn't make sense that the first child was born to an Elizabeth, the second to a Martha, and the third and fourth to an Elizabeth. Best regards, Sue |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Committed Member
![]()
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southampton UK
Posts: 70
|
Hello Sue,
It is perfectly possible that Martha called herself Elizabeth at times. It definitely sounds as if she did. I have several cases where a Mary Ann called herself Ann for much of her older life. Similarly with Elizabeth Ann. How do you know her maiden name was Petts? Don't forget that the IGI is only a tiny fraction of the baptisms/marriages that actually took place, and be careful with submitted ones, as against parish collected. They are often wrong. Also, of course, some parish register years simply do not exist due to destruction over the centuries. What you really need is a lookup on the actual registers and that I am afraid I cannot help you with. I don't even know where the ones for Newport Pagnell are held. Sorry to be so negative. Perhaps someone else can help. Regards Victoria |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Committed Member
![]()
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 59
|
Hi Victoria,
Thank you very much for all your help. You are right, I would be better off with a parish register look-up. On the IGI I found the marriage of a Thomas Garratt and Elizabeth Petts in 1820 which fits, but of course, there's no guarantee that it's correct. Thanks, Sue Last edited by sudjhr; 13-05-2008 at 08:25 AM. |
|
|
|