Register
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    AA Member Novice leadbelly is an unknown quantity at this point
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    18

    Default Searching for Mary Jane Crook (Nee Miller) circa 1901

    Hi

    I am hoping you can help trace the death of Mary Jane Crook, born June 1856 in Gateshead, Co Durham, to William & Mary Miller.



    I have located the following data:

    1865 birth registration in Gateshead

    1871 census listing in Newcastle upon Tyne with parents

    1884 marriage at Monk Heseldon to Arthur Crook of Lewisham Kent

    1891 census listing in Heagly St. Lee. Lewisham, Kent with husband Arthur and 3 children



    Other info secured-

    Arthur Crook dies in Lee Union Infirmary in 1896

    3 of 4 children are admitted to Lewisham workhouse infirmary and subsequently sent to Anerley School then onto service.



    I am unable to locate the whereabouts of Mary Jane Crook in the late 1890's or the 1901 census or her death



    Hoping you can help & Thank you in anticipation

  2. #2
    AA Member Respected Member Jeuel is an unknown quantity at this point
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    890

    Default Re: Searching for Mary Jane Crook (Nee Miller) circa 1901

    Have you looked for a second marriage?

  3. #3
    AA Member Novice leadbelly is an unknown quantity at this point
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    18

    Default Re: Searching for Mary Jane Crook (Nee Miller) circa 1901

    Hi Helen

    Your suggestion is a good one and one I have not looked into but will now undertake.



    I am aware that her eldest 3 children were sent onto "service" after a spell each at Anerley School, Penge, and that they youngest child, William James Crook, (my Grandfather) was taken North to live in Newcastle by his Aunt (on his fathers side) and at that point Mary Jane just dropped off the radar.



    Would a widow generally be remarried under her maiden name of her married name?



    Thanks Gerry

  4. #4
    AA Member Respected Member welshlady is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Shropshire
    Posts
    1,969

    Default Re: Searching for Mary Jane Crook (Nee Miller) circa 1901

    Hi

    they are usually married under their married name but it is always best to check under maiden name as well as it has been known.



    as the children were put in other peoples care it would suggest more to me that she did die as if she remarried some of them especially the youngest are more likely to have stayed with her.
    Census information Crown Copyright, in care of TNA

  5. #5
    AA Member Novice leadbelly is an unknown quantity at this point
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    18

    Default Re: Searching for Mary Jane Crook (Nee Miller) circa 1901

    Thank You Welshlady

    My original thoughts were also that she had died but no matter how many checks and methods of checking I use I come up with onlythe proverbial brickwall



    Thank you Gerry

  6. #6
    AA Member Respected Member welshlady is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Shropshire
    Posts
    1,969

    Default Re: Searching for Mary Jane Crook (Nee Miller) circa 1901

    agreed i cannot find a death for her but neither can i find a remarriage so I am afraid brick wall remains for now
    Census information Crown Copyright, in care of TNA

  7. #7
    AA Member Novice leadbelly is an unknown quantity at this point
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    18

    Default Re: Searching for Mary Jane Crook (Nee Miller) circa 1901

    Thank you most kindly for your efforts

  8. #8
    AA Member Newbie crubinace is an unknown quantity at this point
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    12

    Default Re: Searching for Mary Jane Crook (Nee Miller) circa 1901

    Hi, I have just done a search on the NBI and the only Mary Jane Crook that I can find is Burial Date: 1 May 1914, Age 66, County: Lincs, Cleethorpes, Cemetery.



    Christine

  9. #9
    AA Member Respected Member welshlady is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Shropshire
    Posts
    1,969

    Default Re: Searching for Mary Jane Crook (Nee Miller) circa 1901

    trouble is there are lots of areas missing from that and she could have been buried as mary crook without the Jane . unless there are connections with that area hard to tell
    Census information Crown Copyright, in care of TNA

  10. #10
    AA Member Novice leadbelly is an unknown quantity at this point
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    18

    Default Re: Searching for Mary Jane Crook (Nee Miller) circa 1901

    Thanks Christine & Welshlady for your kind assistance



    I dont think the MJ Crook buried in Lincs will be the one I am researching.

    I know from past searches that I have carried out that there was/is a large contingent of Crook families in that area as well as a large contingent in Lancs. However the family I am researching belong originally in Gloucestershire, then their ancestors moved from Glos. to Lee, Lewisham, Kent. ( Greater London today). With Mary Jane Crook (nee Miller) originating from Gateshead, County Durham. She married Arthur Crook in Monk Heselden, Durham before moving south to Lewisham



    To date I have identified another Mary Jane Crook buried in Guildford in 1898, but a purchase of the death cert shows a different husband to Arthur. In fact once I had this data I was able to identify this incorrect Mary Jane and husband in a 1891 census and I could also identify, in the same census, my MJ Crook with husband Arthur and 3 of their 4 children.( the 4th child William James Crook (my Grandfather) was born in Jan 1892) .

    I have identified othe deaths of a Mary Jane Crook at Bicester, Chorley, Blackburn, Kings North,Leeds and Whithaven from 1901 to 1909 but have discounted each for one reason or another



    I have further identified a Mary Crook who was in the Lewisham Union Workhouse in 1901. However documents secured from the archive staff show this Mary Crook was put into the workhouse by her mother Mrs Cobb of 22 Dalmain Road, Lewisham. My Mary Jane Crook's(nee Miller) living mother in law was Henrietta Crook residing at 12 High Road, Lee, Lewisham in 1901 census, so therefore assume this Mary Crook is not correct for my search.



    I have also checked with records from Lewisham crematorium for burials from 1901 to 1954 to no avail



    Other than these two above, and despite a rigorous search, I have been unsuccessful in identifying any other likely candidates.



    Again many thanks for your efforts

    Gerry

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Back to Top

SEO by vBSEO 3.5.1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276