I noticed on the 1901 census there is a column for Employer, Worker or Own Account.
An ancestor of mine is listed as a bookseller, own account working from home.
Do you think I can assume own account simply means self employed?
Thanks
Elanter
I noticed on the 1901 census there is a column for Employer, Worker or Own Account.
An ancestor of mine is listed as a bookseller, own account working from home.
Do you think I can assume own account simply means self employed?
Thanks
Elanter
Hi elanter - yes it does
Gillian
Hi Elanter
I agree, just had a look at 1 page of 7 residences, the 3 music teachers were all "own Account", there were 7 people with occupation "living on own means" and had nothing in that column, neither did the retired Customs Officer, strangely the 4 servants had nothing in that column either, the others with occupations listed were 4 workers and 2 employers.
Just a quick analysis that someone might be of interest.
Regards
Regards David
Families: Ross (Glasgow, Liverpool, Manchester) Larrance (Portsea, City of London) Wood (Islington, Walthamstow) Heaton (Gateshead, Lynton, Walthamstow)
Thanks for you replies.
Pity my ancestor's name wasn't Foyle or Waterstone.
I thought it was interesting that the servants had nothing in the work column when you consider how hard they actually did worked. I've a few in my tree, I'll have to have a look and see if it's the norm. I also wonder how much income one would have needed in 1901 to live reasonably well on their own means.
I recently came across another new entry, a widowed ancestor was listed as an Annuitant under Rank, Profession or Occupation in 1851. I was quite surprised really, as the family seemed to be on very low incomes, ag labs etc.and wouldn't have thought they would have had the extra money to pay for an annuity, but perhaps her husband was forward thinking enough to save her from the workhouse. I doubt if I'd be able to find any more information though.
Thanks again
Elanter