Thread: gloucestershire census lookup please. 1851/61/71

I am looking for tha Lusty family in 51/61/71. They would be around the general area of Nympsfield. Thomas Lusty born about 1823 & wife Elizabeth. Elizabeth was born in Nympsfield. Children I know of were Ellen, hannah, & Harold, There were more children. Many thanks.

Hi Seeker,



1851 Uley Gloucestershire



George Burford 19 Albert Lusty 1 Mo Elizabeth Lusty 30 Ellen Lusty 9 Julia Lusty 7 Lavinia Lusty 4 Martha Lusty 5 Rosa Lusty 2 Thomas Lusty 29

George Burford was a visitor. Thomas is a wood turner employing 6 men and boys.









1861 Uley Gloucestershire



Charles Lusty 2

Elizabeth Lusty 39 Ellen Lusty 19 Harold Lusty 8 Julia Lusty 17 Lavinia Lusty 13 Martha Lusty 15 Rowland Lusty 6 Thomas Lusty 37



All born Uley except Elizabeth (Nympsfield) All the young ones are Thomas and Elizabeth's children.

Hello again Seeker,



1871 Bristol St.James, Gloucestershire



Elizth Cole/86/annuitant

Ellen Lusly Hing/9/dau

Harold Hing/1/son

Julia Hing/27/wife

Walton Hing/32/head/licensed victualler



Lavinia Lusty/21/sister in law



Mary Ann Williams/65/annuitant



The "Hing" family have been mistranscribed - the original return seems to read KING and Harold is WALTON



Marriages Dec. 1861



King Walton Dursley 6a371

Lusty Julia Dursley 6a371



Julia and Lavinia are the only 2 'Lusty's ' I have managed to find on the 1871, and I can't find Hannah on any census.

1881 Uley



Charles Lusty/20/brother/carpenter

Lavinia Lusty/31/sister/seamstress

Martha Lusty/33/head/bar-maid unemployed



I'll see if I can find Martha and Charles on the 1871

Seeker ......... I think this is Elizabeth and family in 1871



Wotton under Edge Uley



Charles Thomas Gerity/11/scholar/son

Elizabeth Gerity/mother/30?/housekeeper/married

Martha Gerity/26/Innkeeper/dau

Newland Gerity/15/miller man/son





Looking at the original I would say the surname is LUSTY

And Newland on original is definitely ROWLAND

Also Elizabeth's age is 50 not 30

Sorry no sign of Thomas and still no sign of a Hannah





Elizabeth was still alive in 1901 - a widow.

Hi Slizzy. Thanks so much for all your help, Cheers