|
|||||||
| Register | Login | AA Calendar NEW! | Groups | Mark Forums Read |
Thread: New Burial Planshttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6722481.stm Seems like graves that are 100 years old are likelly ....... |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Super Member
![]()
|
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6722481.stm
Seems like graves that are 100 years old are likelly to be re-used. |
|
(AKA Mary)
How beautiful it is to do nothing and rest afterwards... |
|
|
|
|
| Advertisement |
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Ancestry Aid Manager
![]()
|
70 years is still a long time. With relatives also being able to request that graves are not filled for one more generation it puts it beyond our lifetimes.
I think the thing that is being missed is transcribing the plaques at crematoriums. A little while ago they were there for ten years at a time. Now it is three years and if someone forgets or dosen't bother to repay the plaque is taken down. |
|
Starlight Ancestry Aid Manager
Hampshire:- Barks, Bartholomew, Carpenter, Cousens, Cousins, Dumper, Gallagher, Goodchild, Glasspool, Hoskins, Light, Mason, Monday, Mundy, Pearce, Pitt, Shepherd, Spreadbury, Staniford, Terrill, Thornton, Warne, Webb, Woodford & many more. Top Tip: Use the forum search engine |
|
|
|
|