05-03-2008, 08:31 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 35
|
Re: WWI - Assumption that Ancestor Took Part..
Hello Slizzy,
Oh I've got ahead leaps n bounds this afternoon!! Since discovered that again, I'm 99.99% certain I've got the RIGHT one, I've found that (and I do know the area very well) a few miles from the boys home that Francis John was in there was another home, (now part of West Middlesex Hospital) called Percy House in Isleworth. They have an inmate named Charles William Hancock, correct age. What's gutting though, is that their parents were STILL ALIVE and on the 1901 census they were living in Cambridge (their Father originally came from Cambs)with their YOUNGEST Child. Why would they dump their eldest and 3rd child in homes? Hard to understand...
M
x
Quote:
Originally Posted by slizzy
Hi Morgana,
Could this be Charles do you think? This Charles' birth place is recorded as not known, it appears he's in an orphanage.
1901 England Census
about Charles Hancock
Name: Charles Hancock Age: 10 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1891 Gender: Male Where born: N
Civil Parish: Ramsgate Ecclesiastical parish: St George County/Island: Kent Country: England
Registration district: Thanet Sub-registration district: Ramsgate ED, institution, or vessel: 1 Neighbors: View others on page Household schedule number: 14
|
|
|
|
|
|